What sets an expert apart from a novice?
How does forensic expertise develop over time?
Does the speed of expert decision making influence performance?
How does memory for forensic information relate to matching accuracy?
Can training time be reduced without compromising performance?
What is the best way to provide feedback to examiners about their performance?
Do examiners know when to ask for help?
How much should examiners rely on instructions from a textbook compared to practical experience?
What can examiners reasonably claim when testifying in court?
What is the most effective way to present forensic evidence to juries?
On what basis should judges admit forensic testimony?
Should examiners report opinions or statistics?
